<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kathleenbarnes.com/newsletter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kathleenbarnes.com</link>
	<description>Your guide to a long, healthy life while living gently on the planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:59:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Vargas</title>
		<link>http://www.kathleenbarnes.com/newsletter/comment-page-1#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Vargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kathleenbarnes.com/?page_id=11#comment-358</guid>
		<description>I am interesting to read every month your newsletter. Thank you  Gabriel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interesting to read every month your newsletter. Thank you  Gabriel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.kathleenbarnes.com/newsletter/comment-page-1#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kathleenbarnes.com/?page_id=11#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I read with interest your article about mammography.  Having followed the literature quite a bit since the 1990s, highlighted by the two Canadian studies and the large Danish meta-analysis of Gøtzsche and Nielsen:
http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001877.html
I have read numerous published studies that are relevant to the mammo topic and which support your claims.  
My comment is to encourage you to specifically cite relevant literature and studies.  I feel it would massively add credibility to your articles and also provide additional resources for interested readers to read further on the topic.
There is so much hearsay on the internet, but you have a lot of scientific studies on your side.

Best wishes,

Ralph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read with interest your article about mammography.  Having followed the literature quite a bit since the 1990s, highlighted by the two Canadian studies and the large Danish meta-analysis of Gøtzsche and Nielsen:<br />
<a href="http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001877.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab001877.html</a><br />
I have read numerous published studies that are relevant to the mammo topic and which support your claims.<br />
My comment is to encourage you to specifically cite relevant literature and studies.  I feel it would massively add credibility to your articles and also provide additional resources for interested readers to read further on the topic.<br />
There is so much hearsay on the internet, but you have a lot of scientific studies on your side.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>Ralph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
