Kathleen Barnes

Your guide to a long, healthy life while living gently on the planet

Archive for the ‘General’ Category

09_06_12_thumb1

by Kathleen Barnes

If you’ve had a heart attack, seriously consider eating chocolate at least twice a week to dramatically cut their risk of dying of heart disease.

Researchers found that heart attack survivors who ate chocolate at least three times a week reduced their risk of dying from heart disease threefold compared to those who never eat chocolate.

This new study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine is the first to conclude that consuming chocolate can prevent death if you’ve already had a heart attack.

Swedish researchers who conducted the research theorize the antioxidants in chocolate, particularly catechins and phenols, are responsive for the protective effect.

I know, it sounds too good to be true, but we’ve known for some time that various components of chocolate are heart protective.

Earlier research has established a strong relationship between cocoa-based foods and lower blood pressure and improvement in blood flow. Other studies show chocolate helps improve mood and reduce the symptoms of PMS.

Almost all studies show that your chocolate should be dark chocolate. Milk chocolate and even dark chocolate eaten with a cold glass of milk don’t have the same effect.

The Swedish study doesn’t mention specific amounts of chocolate, but for caloric reasons, it’s probably a good idea to limit your intake to an ounce of two at a time.

What’s not to love about this study?

Reference:

Janszky I, Mukamal KJ et al. Chocolate consumption and mortality following a first acute myocardial infarction: the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program, Jouranl fo Interal Medicine 2009 Sept;226(3):248-57

Share

by Kathleen Barnes

We Americans are getting even more supersized than ever. More than one third of all adults and 16 percent of all children are obese, according to just-released government statistics.

This puts 26.1 percent of the overall population at accelerated risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and certain types of cancer because of their excess weight.

Obesity numbers inching upwards

Those numbers keep inching upwards, up .5% from 25.6% in 2007 to 26.1% in 2008.

Even more shocking, the CDC says more than two-thirds of American are overweight (defined as a body mass index of 25 or more).

African-Americans bear the greatest burden of the obesity epidemic, with 80 percent of African-American women either overweight or obese and a 51 percent obesity rate, followed by Mexican-American women with an overweight/obesity rate of 73%.

Obesity is defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a body mass index of 30 or higher.
[Find a Body Mass Index (BMI) calculator based on height and weight.

Causes of obesity, according to conventional docs

Conventional medical doctors attribute this alarming increase to our transformation into a nation of fast-food chomping couch potatoes.

There is certainly some truth to that as recent statistics show that two-thirds of us eat less than two servings of fruit a day and 73% of us don’t get the minimum three servings of vegetables, the foundations of a healthy diet. Sadly, those statistics actually include French fries as a vegetable!

And 37 percent of us admit that we do not engage in any physical activity or exercise at all.

We know there is no “magic bullet,” or magic pill that will cause you to shed pounds overnight.

Underlying cause: systemic imbalances

However, a variety of biological imbalances can cause overeating and slow metabolism, according to Dr. Hyla Cass, who wrote 8 Weeks to Vibrant Health: A Take Charge Plan for Women (Take Charge Books 2008) with me.

“Conventional doctors are thinking in a linear manner; that is calories ingested minus calories burned = leftover calories that turn into fat,” says Dr. Cass. “There`s far more to weight gain than that, since we all burn calories differently based on our individual body`s metabolic efficiency.”

Dr. Cass urges her patients to look at their food intake and their exercise out put and ask themselves, “If you`re eating too much , why? If you’re not exercising enough, why not?”

The answer clearly lies in a systemic imbalance, she says.

Among the causes of overweight, says Dr. Cass, are hormonal fluctuations, thyroid malfunction chronic adrenal overload, unbalanced blood sugar food allergies, neurotransmitter imbalances that lead to uncontrolled food cravings and even bad genetics.

Finally, Dr. Cass says, explore the possibility you have one of these systemic imbalances and find a health care practitioner who will help.

“You are not to blame if you are overweight. But you`re responsible for taking the steps to solve the problem.”

Sources:

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html

http://www.cdc.gov/NCCdphp/publications/AAG/obesity.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/defining.html

http://www.cdc.gov/mmWR/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5610a2.htm

http://famellist.info/?p=29404

Share

By Kathleen Barnes

If I found myself stranded on a desert island, I’d have the assurance of an unlimited source of the healthiest food I could imagine: Omega-3 fatty acids and high quality protein from wild caught fish. Add a few tropical fruits and I could probably live a long and healthy life on my desert island.

Of course, if I am lucky enough to find myself far away from the “civilized world,” I improve my chances of finding fish free of toxins.

Fish may just be the stuff of life. Its healthy fats are essential to optimal cardiovascular function, joint health, brain function and blood sugar metabolism, just to mention a few of its multitude of benefits.

Sadly, most of the fish available on North American markets comes from fish farms which are little more than cesspools of toxic sludge that not only pollute our waterways, but pollute our bodies when we consume them.

They’re completely unsustainable as well Salmon are carnivorous, so it takes 2.2 pounds of wild fish to produce one pound of farmed salmon. Fish farming is rapidly depleting wild fish populations.

Fish farms produce about one-third of the world’s seafood, most notably nearly all the catfish and trout and half of the shrimp and salmon so important to human nutrition.

It’s cheap: Farmed salmon can be $4 to $5 a pound cheaper than wild-caught salmon, but the price is too high in terms of our health and to the health of our environment and wild fish populations.

Toxic mash

In a landmark 2002 study, Canadian researchers found that a single serving of farmed salmon contains three to six times the World Health Organization’s daily intake limit for dioxin and PCBs.
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), chemicals once used in the manufacture of electrical and heating equipment, paints, plastics, rubbers, dyes and many other substances, were banned in 1977 after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency called them “probable human carcinogens.”

However, PCBs are still present in water, soil, aid and food supplies.
In its Dec. 26, 2005 issue, U.S. News and World Report reported that farmed salmon are raised on fish pellets derived from local fish that often contaminated with PCBs.

The study in the November 2005 issue of the Journal of Nutrition reports that contaminant levels in farmed salmon from certain regions increase the risk of cancer enough to outweigh benefits.

The study showed that farmed salmon from South America, specifically Chile, had the lowest level of pollutants, followed by those form North America. Europe had the highest level, according to David Carpenter, co-author of the study and director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany’s School of Public Health. Pacific wild salmon also has some contaminants from the natural environment, specifically mercury, but these are at a low enough level that the benefits outweigh the risks.

Mercury can be a big problem with farmed fish. Purdue University nutritionists found that eating as little as one fish sandwich from farmed fish weekly could give a 60-kg. adult a 40% of the safe maximum mercury exposure.

Fish farms are most often composed of huge net enclosures in the open sea. Disease is rampant in these crowded pens.

Large quantities of chemicals are used in aquaculture, including antibiotics, pesticides, hormones, anesthetics, vitamins, minerals and anti-parasitical substances most often dumped directly into the ocean waters.

Not only are these potentially toxic substances incorporated into the tissues of the farmed fish, tides and even simple wave action sweep these chemicals out of the nets and into the open seas.

The use of antibiotics is particularly hazardous to the health of human beings and fish since it promotes the spread of antibiotic resistance.
Farmers dose their captive fish with a potent anti-parasitic drug called ivermectin, to rid them of sea lice and known to kill some species of shrimp.

Damage to the environment

Within a few years after large scale fish farming operations began in Canada, shrimp fishermen began pulling up traps full of a deadly mixture of feces, excess antibiotic –laden fish feed and decayed salmon carcasses that had drifted out of the pens.

It’s estimated that one single pen of 200,000 fish produces as much fecal waste as a city of 25,000 people.

In British Columbia, many inlets are caged off for huge Atlantic salmon farms. Although fish farmers assure that they have contained these genetically modified fish with voracious appetites to encourage fast growth, an estimated 40,000 to 1 million have escaped.

Biologists have found Atlantis salmon from the farms in 77 British Columbian streams. When these super-fish get into the wild, they compete unfairly for food resources, causing an increased rate of starvation among wild fish,” wrote Bruce Barcott in a December 2001 article in Mother Jones magazine.

Yet business is booming for fish farmers. Stricter environmental regulations in Norway have pushed fish farming operators to the Western hemisphere. In early 2002, the Canadian government lifted its seven-year moratorium on expanding fish farms in British Columbia. By 2003, there were 85 fish farms in operation in British Columbia and 90 applications pending. The government has stated its intention to quadruple the province’s salmon production by 2013.

Part of the allure of fish farming is to reduce the pressure on the world’s oceans, but that may be wishful thinking. Fish farming is an inefficient means of producing protein. A Feb. 6, 2003 article in The Christian Science Monitor notes that raising carnivorous fish like salmon and shrimp may actually reduce the numbers of wild fish since it takes 2.2 pounds of ground-up fish to make a pound of farmed salmon.

Answer: Avoid most fish

Yet there seems to be a Gordian knot around fish consumption – and the very experts on whom we rely for the best possible information are sending us mixed messages about the best way to get the healthy fats fish provides.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration sets much more lenient toxin levels than does its kissing cousin, the Environmental Protection Agency. Most experts recommend being even more conservative about toxin exposure and some advise avoiding fish altogether.

Despite nutritionists extolling the virtues of high fish consumption, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration strongly recommends limiting the amount of fish we eat. The health advisory issued in March 2004 does not distinguish between farm-raised and wild-caught fish.

Let’s face it: Nearly all fish contains some level of mercury.

The FDA recommends that all women who are pregnant, may become pregnant, nursing mothers and young children abstain completely from shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish because of the high levels of mercury contamination that may be particularly harmful to unborn babies and the developing nervous system of young children.
The FDA advisory recommends weekly consumption of no more than 12 ounces of fish and shellfish lower in mercury, including shrimp, canned light tuna, salmon, pollock and catfish.

It also advises keeping up to date on local fish safety warnings and, if there is no advisory available, not to eat more than six ounces of local-caught fish weekly.

Yet many of us are still getting too much mercury—some of it due to the 40 tons of mercury released into the atmosphere annually by coal-fired power plants.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study in November 2005 that showed fully six percent of U.S. women of childbearing age had mercury levels above the levels that could put them at risk for nervous system defects.

Natural health advocate Joseph Mercola, D.O., says several more fish should be added to the list of fish to avoid, including tuna steaks, sea bass, oysters from the Gulf of Mexico, marlin, halibut, pike, walleye, white croaker and largemouth bass and urges the FDA to expand the list of fish to be avoided and those acceptable for limited consumption.

“I now warn my patients against consuming any fish, whether farm-raised or naturally-caught: fish of all varieties from any waters are now showing dangerously high levels of the tasteless, but highly toxic metal, mercury,” says Mercola.

Share

Note: This article was originally published in the e-zine 360boom

Evidence is building that depression can trigger diabetes. Don’t get diabetes, it my lead to depression. Don’t get depressed, it may lead to diabetes. A study has demonstrated a relationship between type 2 diabetes and depression; not only can diabetes lead to depression, depression can also lead to diabetes.

Dr. Sherita Hill Golden of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore led the study which tracked an ethnically diverse group – 5,000 men and women between ages 45 to 84 for three years. The study revealed that people with depression have a higher risk of developing the most common form of diabetes than others.

Those with symptoms of depression were 42% more likely to develop diabetes by the end of the study than those without such symptoms – the more serious the symptoms, the higher the risk of diabetes.

Researchers accounted for factors including obesity, lack of physical activity and smoking. They found the risk for diabetes was still 34% higher in patients with depression.

People in our study who had elevated symptoms of depression, were more likely to eat more calories, exercise less and were more likely to be smokers. As a consequence, they were also more obese.

Dr. Golden’s study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The study also measured the risk for developing depression among people who already had diabetes. To do this, the researchers excluded people who had elevated symptoms of depression at the outset of the study.

Share

April 29, 2009

In these troubled times, many of us can’t afford to go totally organic.

So, if you’re going part-way, how do you get the most bang for your food buck?

The chart below will help you make some decisions. Starting with pesticide-laden peaches, apples and sweet green peppers down to the low pesticide load pineapples, avocados and onions, this will give you some helpful tools.

Pesticide Load in Fruits and Vegetables

FRUIT/VEGETABLE
1 (worst) Peach
2 Apple
3 Sweet Bell Pepper
4 Celery
5 Nectarine
6 Strawberries
7 Cherries
8 Kale
9 Lettuce
10 Grapes-Imported
11 Carrot
12 Pear
13 Collard Green
14 Spinach
15 Potato
16 Green Beans
17 Summer Squash
18 Pepper
19 Cucumber
20 Raspberries
21 Grapes-Domestic
22 Plum
23 Orange
24 Cauliflower
25 Tangerine
26 Mushrooms
27 Banana
28 Winter Squash
29 Cantalope
30 Cranberries
31 Honeydew Melon
32 Grapefruit
33 Sweet Potato
34 Tomato
35 Broccoli
36 Watermelon
37 Papaya
38 Eggplant
39 Cabbage
40 Kiwi
41 Sweet Peas-Frozen
42 Asparagus
43 Mango
44 Pineapple
45 Sweet Corn-Frozen
46 Avocado
47 (best) Onion
Source: Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma (Penguin Books 2008)

I have to add a personal note here: I know coffee is technically a vegetable, certainly it is a staple of life for many of us. However, coffee is not included on the above list.

Coffee is one of the most pesticide intensive crops in the world. If you’re a coffee lover like I am, consider lowering your toxic load by buying organic coffee, better yet shade grown and fair traded to add to the eco-friendly perks. (Pun intended!)

Kathleen Barnes

Share

April 22, 2009

I couldn’t let Earth Day pass without offering some simple ways each of us can contribute to the healing of the planet.

I know. The enormity of the problem is often overwhelming.

The starfish story

It reminds me of the story of the small boy who came upon a beach littered with thousands of starfish, all in their death throes because the tide had carried them beyond the waterline.

The boy set about picking up the starfish and tossing them back into the sea. An old man walking the beach ridiculed the child for engaging in a hopeless cause.

“Why bother? You can’t save them all,” the old man proclaimed.

“That’s true. But I can save this one. And this one. And this one,” the boy replied as he continued returning the stranded starfish to the sea.

You can’t save the world by yourself, but you can do your part. Each of us together can make the change that will make a difference.

Do these today

Here are some really easy ways you can live sustainably, starting today. They will cost you nothing or almost nothing. In fact, most of them will save you money:

1. Get a stainless steel water bottle and stop drinking bottled water.
2. Invest in a few shopping bags and just say “no” to plastic bags.
3. If you don’t already do it recycle, at least your cans, bottles and paper.
4. Turn off the water while you’re brushing your teeth.
5. Limit your showers to five minutes.
6. Turn off the lights if you’re out of the room for more than five minutes.
7. Replace your regular light bulbs with compact fluorescents.
8. Eat organic foods as much as possible, especially fruits and coffee, which carry heavy pesticide loads.
9. Buy locally produced products, especially food. This saves on your gas, gives you fresher, more nutritious food and saves on the pollution and fuel consumption of long distance shipping.
10. Say “no” to acquiring additional plastic goods for your household.

Bonus

Finally, here’s your bonus:
Honor Earth Day by planting a tree on the south side of your house. In a few years, it will shade the house and lower your cooling costs in summer.

Happy Earth Day!

Kathleen Barnes

Share

Note: This post was written by Dr. Scott Olson, a naturopath extraordinaire, whose book, Sugarettes, is packed with eye-opening information about the dangers of sugar. I’m hoping to be able to give you more guests post form Dr. Olson and other experts. ~Kathleen

Sugar can be sneaky. You might think that you know when you are eating sugar; after all, sugar tastes sweet. But the moment you start reading labels, you begin to realize how many foods you eat have sugar in them. Food manufactures also have a bad habit of changing the name of sugar in order to confuse you into not knowing that you are eating sugar.

Sugar has well-known addictive qualities; this is the reason why it is added to crackers, coffee, peanut butter, salad dressing, sauces, salsa and just about every other food you eat.

Labels Can Be Confusing

If you take a peek at a label, it may not be that clear to you that the food you are buying contains sugar. One of the best ways figure out if there is a sugar in the food is to look out for the “ose” ending. Many sugars have an “ose” ending, such as: glucose, fructose, maltose and others. It is not a guarantee that you are looking at a sugar when you see the “ose” ending, but most likely so.

The Many Names of Sugar

Sugar is sugar no matter what the name and here are some of the other names for common sugar additives:
• Beet sugar
• Brown sugar
• Cane sugar
• Concentrated grape juice
• Confectioner’s sugar
• Corn sweeteners
• Corn syrup
• Crystallized cane juice
• Dextrin
• Dextrose
• Evaporated cane juice
• Fructose
• Fruit juice concentrate
• Galactose
• Glucose
• High-fructose corn syrup
• HFCS
• Honey
• Invert sugar
• Lactose
• Malt
• Maltodextrin
• Maltose
• Mannitol
• Maple syrup
• Molasses
• Powdered sugar
• Raw sugar
• Sorbitol
• Sorghum
• Sucrose
• Table sugar
• Turbinado sugar
• White sugar
• Xylitol

Other Hidden Sugars

If you are trying to find the sneakiest sugars of them all, you have to look beyond the list above. The sneakiest sugars are the foods that act like sugar. These foods, such as breads, cracker, chips, bagels and even potatoes, act just like sugar in your body. If you are looking to make the plunge into a sugar-free diet because you understand how bad sugars are for your health, then you should also remember to include the foods that act like sugar.

Any step that you might take to remove sugars from your diet is a step towards better health. This guide to the sneaky sugars should help you along your way.

–Dr. Scott Olson

Share

by Dr. Robert Thompson, co-author, with Kathleen Barnes,

The Calcium Lie: What Your Doctor Doesn’t Know Could Kill You (InTruth Press, 2008)

Are you overweight? Is someone you love overweight?

No doubt your doctor has told you to eat less and exercise more while discreetly adjusting a lab coat to cover a personal paunch. Take a good look. Is your doctor an example of good health? If not, maybe your doctor doesn’t have the answer.

You’ve struggled. You faithfully get up at 5 a.m. every day for a morning jog. You’ve tried Atkins, South Beach, Jenny Craig and Weight Watchers. You gulp down chromium picolinate, 5-HTP, garcinia cambogia, hoodia, Alli and every fad supplement. You’ve probably had some success, but for almost all of us, the success is temporary. The weight begins to creep back on until you’ve regained all you lost and then some.

Why is that? Are we all weak-willed, unable to resist the temptation of the dinner plate? Is our willpower so lacking that we can’t even do the basic exercise of pushing away from the dinner table?

No! We are turning into a fat nation (Generation XL) because we are quite literally starving.
That’s right: In a time of unparalleled food wealth, we cannot get the nutrients our bodies need to function. Specifically, mineral deficiencies and imbalances, especially excess calcium intake, are leading us to metabolic failures of unprecedented proportions.

Starving for minerals

What are we starving for? Minerals. What are we stuffed with? Calcium.

Our society is obsessed with one of the most deadly medical myths ever perpetrated: That we need calcium in order to have strong bones. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Our bones are made of a dozen or more minerals, and calcium is just one of them. We need all of these minerals in the proper proportions

Most of us get way too much calcium and nowhere near enough of the others minerals we need, not only for strong bones, but for our overall health.

Calcium hardens concrete

Did you know that construction workers actually use calcium to harden concrete? That explains a lot about the harmful effects of excess calcium in your body.
It’s a vicious circle: We are starving for the minerals we need, and so we are driven through cravings to eat more and more food in an effort to get those minerals into our cells where they are essential for literally trillions of metabolic functions.

But our foods are low in minerals because of our mineral-poor soil and because few are vine ripened. So we eat more and more.

Our metabolism is slowed because of calcium excess, adrenal suppression and thyroid hormone resistance (Type 2 hypothyroidism).

Digestion is impaired; stomach acid is deficient or improperly released.

Protein is not fully digested and essential amino acids are not absorbed.

Amino acids can’t make it into our cells due to sodium pump failure. More cravings are stimulated by amino acid deficiencies and resulting neurotransmitter deficiencies.

Downward spiral

It’s a terrible, uncontrollable, downward spiral. Since we all know the well-documented risks of being overweight, it all seems so sad to think that we are killing ourselves in a desperate struggle to get the nutrients we need to survive and all the while we are admonished to get our calcium, diet and exercise.

Here’s the answer in short: Get all the minerals you need with the liberal use of unrefined sea salt.

I’m here to tell you that if you exercise like a hamster on the wheel and eat nothing but lettuce for the rest of your life, it will cause no permanent changes unless you treat your underlying metabolic imbalances by balancing and raising your mineral levels.

All meaningful weight loss must involve treating the underlying metabolic problem. Only proper mineral balance in the body can do this.

You’ll find a more detailed explanation of the effects of excess calcium on your weight and a host of other health problems in The Calcium Lie: What Your Doctor Doesn’t Know Could Kill You, my book written with health writer Kathleen Barnes. You’ll also find loads of material on our website, www.calciumlie.com.

–Dr. Robert Thompson is a physician practicing in Anchorage and Soldotna, Alaska.

Share