Kathleen Barnes

Your guide to a long, healthy life while living gently on the planet

Archive for the ‘General’ Category

The House of Representatives has voted to make the new credit laws effective immediately in the face of flagrant abuses by credit companies hoping to beat the February deadline by raising interest rates into the stratosphere.

The Senate has not yet taken up the measure, and it is uncertain what will happen there, but Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) is pressing for legislation that will freeze interest rates on existing balances until the new law takes effect.

The Federal Reserve has released a bank survey in which 50 percent of the banks responding admitted they are increasing interest rates and reducing credit lines even on credit card holders with good credit scores.

Even more disturbing is a study by the Pew charitable trusts reported by the New York Times on Nov. 9 “Concludes that the 12 largest banks issuing more than 80 percent of all credit cards, are continuing to use practices that the Fed considers ‘unfair or deceptive’ and in many cases have been outlawed by Congress.”

What can you do?

Contact your Senators and urge them to make the new credit card law effective immediately, as the House has done.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sept 28, 2009

Here‘s a little rant about social networking.

In recent times, you were nobody if you weren’t on Twitter. It was an essential business and personal branding tool.

I am on Twitter (@KathleenSBarnes) and am approaching 2,400 followers. Not too shabby. I have some wonderful followers who post interesting stuff.

But lately, I find I have to make myself to go Twitter and post a couple of pithy 140-character comments each day. I actually miss a lot of these.

Why? Because I find my inbox inundated with new followers that offer nothing less than spam. There are the ads to get thousands of new followers effortlessly, multi-level marketing companies promising untold riches and folks who want to sell me coaching packages for “only $997.”

That’s not even mentioning the uptick in pornography. Hey folks, I’m not a guy. Not many people named “Kathleen” are guys.

When Twitter began, it was frankly, silly. I mean, who cares if you’re at Starbucks drinking a latte or sitting in the dentist’s office?

Then Twitter hit its heyday in 6 or 8 months ago with interesting people saying interesting things, folks tweeting from the plane that made an emergency landing in the Hudson River, even tweeting news stories before the conventional news media caught on to the fact that news was breaking and the people on the scene had already gotten the word out. News organizations even began creating Twitter accounts so they could get the early scoops. Who could forget the power of the tweets that came out of Iran after the stolen election? That was social networking at its zenith.

During that heady time, I could hardly wait to logon in the mornings and dip my toes into the unending stream of interesting and thought-provoking information. I found myself enticed back there several times a day. I used TweetDeck to stay up to date with group of followers whose tweets I found the most useful. I probably spent too much tie there, but I know I learned a great deal and I am richer for the experience.

I hope that, in return, I offered information that was of value to them. I will continue to do so, although perhaps less frequently.

I’m waiting out this deluge of scamsters, get-rich-quick schemes and other mindless nonsense. Hopefully, this will pass and Twitter will regain some of its fascination for me. If not, I’ll move on to something more exciting and useful.

Until then, I’m choosing to spend less time on Twitter. Call it asocial networking. I’m spending more time on some exciting new projects I’ll be telling you about soon. It’s more productive and more personally satisfying. I promise not to scam you or spam you. Ever.

  • Share/Bookmark

Unprecedented shortages of dessicated or natural thyroid hormones like Armour thyroid and Nature-Throid are causing serious problems for patients with hypothyroidism.

Shortages of Armour thyroid have become fairly common in recent years, but the recent shortage of Nature-Throid indicates the pressure to take patients off the natural hormones that have been available for 100 years and force them onto synthetic thyroid hormones.

Minimum 90-day back order

Both Armour and RLC Labs, manufacturer of Nature-Throid and a similar formula called Westbrook, have announced that the most commonly used strengths of their products are on back order for at least 90 days and quite possibly considerably longer.

Is FDA forcing naturals off the market?

Thyroid patient advocate Mary Shoman has written on About.com that the FDA is attempting to force the manufacturers to go through a new drug application, a process that typically takes years and is patently absurd for a medication that has been in safe use for more than a century.

Dr. Hyla Cass, who works with many patients with hypothyoidism, suggests that patients shop around. She also suggests they consider taking a natural compounded T3/T4 formula.

Steve Metcalf, R.Ph., owner of my little compounding pharmacy in Brevard, NC, says he is unable to get dessicated thyroid in any form . He is currently using up the last of his supplies of tiny 1/4 grain tablets.

“We don’t know where this is going, but if you can find it anywhere, I suggest you buy a year’s supply or more,” he said.

Shomon writes, “Bottom line: at some point in the next several months, some patients will likely face a complete unavailability of all desiccated thyroid drugs, manufactured and compounded.”

Dessicated thyroid hormones are made from pork thyroids. Shomon reports that the raw materials supply has been interrupted and suggests that manufacturers may be abandoning their efforts to produce the hormones.

If you’re among the millions of Americans diagnosed with hypothyroidism, you know how difficult it is to get diagnosed and to find a hormone that works for you. To have the rug yanked out form under us is simply unacceptable.

Take action

You can make your feelings known to the FDA through its website, or by phone at: 1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332):

Kathleen Barnes

  • Share/Bookmark

ist1_4424358-nutritional-supplements
Two really important studies crossed my desk recently, both showing profound advantages of vitamin supplementation in reducing markers of heart disease and in prolonging life in those at risk of heart disease.

I’ve long been an advocate of supplements since we know that it is nearly impossible to get all the nutrients we need from our food grown in nutrient depleted soil.

These studies underscore the importance of multivitamins and vitamins C and E for a long, healthy life.

Vitamin C deficiency

Canadian researchers found that nonsmoking young people (ages 20 to 29) deficient in Vitamin C had elevated risks of serious chronic disease. The study showed that 47% of the 979 subjects had suboptimal or deficient blood levels of ascorbic acid, the major ingredient in vitamin C.

Those with low ascorbic acid levels had higher levels of C-reactive protein, higher blood pressure, larger waist circumference and higher body mass index.

Voluminous research shows that this combination of health issues vastly increases the risk of heart disease and stroke, diabetes and certain types of cancer.

The researchers from the University of Toronto attributed the vitamin C deficiency in their study subjects to poor diet and warned that not only do these risks factor present a very clear and present health danger, the long-term dangers become extremely serous when we take into account the compounding of these factors over the coming 20, 30 or 40 years.

Multivitamin and vitamin E supplementation

The second shows that multivitamins and vitamin E supplementation can be protective against death from heart disease,

The recent large study from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle involved 77,719 people ages 50 to 76 over a 10-year period, showed that and those whole took multivitamins nearly every day had a 16% lower risk of dying of heart disease. Those who took more than 215 mg. of vitamin E daily for ten years or more were even more protected with a 28% lower risk of dying of heart disease.

Interestingly, the Fred Hutchinson study did not find any reduced risk for those who took vitamin C daily, although other studies have shown the importance of vitamin C for heart health, particularly in keeping blood vessels open.

The take home message here is that vitamin C certainly has an important role in your nutritional arsenal against a host of chronic and potentially fatal disease. The place of a good quality multivitamin is unquestioned and these studies add to the evidence in favor of vitamin E.

Kathleen Barnes

Resources:

Cahill, L, Corey PN et al, Vitamin C deficiency in a population of young Canadian adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 Aug. 15;170(4):464-71.

Pocobelli, G, Peters, U et al. Use of supplements of mulitvitamins, vitamin C and vitamin E in relation to mortality. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 Aug.15;170(4):472-83.

Frikke-Schmidt, H, Lykkesfeldt R, Rise of marginal vitamin C deficiency in atherogenesis: in vivo models and clinical studies. Basic Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology 2009 Jun;104(6):419-33.

  • Share/Bookmark

09_06_12_thumb1

by Kathleen Barnes

If you’ve had a heart attack, seriously consider eating chocolate at least twice a week to dramatically cut their risk of dying of heart disease.

Researchers found that heart attack survivors who ate chocolate at least three times a week reduced their risk of dying from heart disease threefold compared to those who never eat chocolate.

This new study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine is the first to conclude that consuming chocolate can prevent death if you’ve already had a heart attack.

Swedish researchers who conducted the research theorize the antioxidants in chocolate, particularly catechins and phenols, are responsive for the protective effect.

I know, it sounds too good to be true, but we’ve known for some time that various components of chocolate are heart protective.

Earlier research has established a strong relationship between cocoa-based foods and lower blood pressure and improvement in blood flow. Other studies show chocolate helps improve mood and reduce the symptoms of PMS.

Almost all studies show that your chocolate should be dark chocolate. Milk chocolate and even dark chocolate eaten with a cold glass of milk don’t have the same effect.

The Swedish study doesn’t mention specific amounts of chocolate, but for caloric reasons, it’s probably a good idea to limit your intake to an ounce of two at a time.

What’s not to love about this study?

Reference:

Janszky I, Mukamal KJ et al. Chocolate consumption and mortality following a first acute myocardial infarction: the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program, Jouranl fo Interal Medicine 2009 Sept;226(3):248-57

  • Share/Bookmark

by Kathleen Barnes

We Americans are getting even more supersized than ever. More than one third of all adults and 16 percent of all children are obese, according to just-released government statistics.

This puts 26.1 percent of the overall population at accelerated risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and certain types of cancer because of their excess weight.

Obesity numbers inching upwards

Those numbers keep inching upwards, up .5% from 25.6% in 2007 to 26.1% in 2008.

Even more shocking, the CDC says more than two-thirds of American are overweight (defined as a body mass index of 25 or more).

African-Americans bear the greatest burden of the obesity epidemic, with 80 percent of African-American women either overweight or obese and a 51 percent obesity rate, followed by Mexican-American women with an overweight/obesity rate of 73%.

Obesity is defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a body mass index of 30 or higher.
[Find a Body Mass Index (BMI) calculator based on height and weight.

Causes of obesity, according to conventional docs

Conventional medical doctors attribute this alarming increase to our transformation into a nation of fast-food chomping couch potatoes.

There is certainly some truth to that as recent statistics show that two-thirds of us eat less than two servings of fruit a day and 73% of us don’t get the minimum three servings of vegetables, the foundations of a healthy diet. Sadly, those statistics actually include French fries as a vegetable!

And 37 percent of us admit that we do not engage in any physical activity or exercise at all.

We know there is no “magic bullet,” or magic pill that will cause you to shed pounds overnight.

Underlying cause: systemic imbalances

However, a variety of biological imbalances can cause overeating and slow metabolism, according to Dr. Hyla Cass, who wrote 8 Weeks to Vibrant Health: A Take Charge Plan for Women (Take Charge Books 2008) with me.

“Conventional doctors are thinking in a linear manner; that is calories ingested minus calories burned = leftover calories that turn into fat,” says Dr. Cass. “There`s far more to weight gain than that, since we all burn calories differently based on our individual body`s metabolic efficiency.”

Dr. Cass urges her patients to look at their food intake and their exercise out put and ask themselves, “If you`re eating too much , why? If you’re not exercising enough, why not?”

The answer clearly lies in a systemic imbalance, she says.

Among the causes of overweight, says Dr. Cass, are hormonal fluctuations, thyroid malfunction chronic adrenal overload, unbalanced blood sugar food allergies, neurotransmitter imbalances that lead to uncontrolled food cravings and even bad genetics.

Finally, Dr. Cass says, explore the possibility you have one of these systemic imbalances and find a health care practitioner who will help.

“You are not to blame if you are overweight. But you`re responsible for taking the steps to solve the problem.”

Sources:

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html

http://www.cdc.gov/NCCdphp/publications/AAG/obesity.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/defining.html

http://www.cdc.gov/mmWR/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5610a2.htm

http://famellist.info/?p=29404

  • Share/Bookmark

By Kathleen Barnes

If I found myself stranded on a desert island, I’d have the assurance of an unlimited source of the healthiest food I could imagine: Omega-3 fatty acids and high quality protein from wild caught fish. Add a few tropical fruits and I could probably live a long and healthy life on my desert island.

Of course, if I am lucky enough to find myself far away from the “civilized world,” I improve my chances of finding fish free of toxins.

Fish may just be the stuff of life. Its healthy fats are essential to optimal cardiovascular function, joint health, brain function and blood sugar metabolism, just to mention a few of its multitude of benefits.

Sadly, most of the fish available on North American markets comes from fish farms which are little more than cesspools of toxic sludge that not only pollute our waterways, but pollute our bodies when we consume them.

They’re completely unsustainable as well Salmon are carnivorous, so it takes 2.2 pounds of wild fish to produce one pound of farmed salmon. Fish farming is rapidly depleting wild fish populations.

Fish farms produce about one-third of the world’s seafood, most notably nearly all the catfish and trout and half of the shrimp and salmon so important to human nutrition.

It’s cheap: Farmed salmon can be $4 to $5 a pound cheaper than wild-caught salmon, but the price is too high in terms of our health and to the health of our environment and wild fish populations.

Toxic mash

In a landmark 2002 study, Canadian researchers found that a single serving of farmed salmon contains three to six times the World Health Organization’s daily intake limit for dioxin and PCBs.
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), chemicals once used in the manufacture of electrical and heating equipment, paints, plastics, rubbers, dyes and many other substances, were banned in 1977 after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency called them “probable human carcinogens.”

However, PCBs are still present in water, soil, aid and food supplies.
In its Dec. 26, 2005 issue, U.S. News and World Report reported that farmed salmon are raised on fish pellets derived from local fish that often contaminated with PCBs.

The study in the November 2005 issue of the Journal of Nutrition reports that contaminant levels in farmed salmon from certain regions increase the risk of cancer enough to outweigh benefits.

The study showed that farmed salmon from South America, specifically Chile, had the lowest level of pollutants, followed by those form North America. Europe had the highest level, according to David Carpenter, co-author of the study and director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany’s School of Public Health. Pacific wild salmon also has some contaminants from the natural environment, specifically mercury, but these are at a low enough level that the benefits outweigh the risks.

Mercury can be a big problem with farmed fish. Purdue University nutritionists found that eating as little as one fish sandwich from farmed fish weekly could give a 60-kg. adult a 40% of the safe maximum mercury exposure.

Fish farms are most often composed of huge net enclosures in the open sea. Disease is rampant in these crowded pens.

Large quantities of chemicals are used in aquaculture, including antibiotics, pesticides, hormones, anesthetics, vitamins, minerals and anti-parasitical substances most often dumped directly into the ocean waters.

Not only are these potentially toxic substances incorporated into the tissues of the farmed fish, tides and even simple wave action sweep these chemicals out of the nets and into the open seas.

The use of antibiotics is particularly hazardous to the health of human beings and fish since it promotes the spread of antibiotic resistance.
Farmers dose their captive fish with a potent anti-parasitic drug called ivermectin, to rid them of sea lice and known to kill some species of shrimp.

Damage to the environment

Within a few years after large scale fish farming operations began in Canada, shrimp fishermen began pulling up traps full of a deadly mixture of feces, excess antibiotic –laden fish feed and decayed salmon carcasses that had drifted out of the pens.

It’s estimated that one single pen of 200,000 fish produces as much fecal waste as a city of 25,000 people.

In British Columbia, many inlets are caged off for huge Atlantic salmon farms. Although fish farmers assure that they have contained these genetically modified fish with voracious appetites to encourage fast growth, an estimated 40,000 to 1 million have escaped.

Biologists have found Atlantis salmon from the farms in 77 British Columbian streams. When these super-fish get into the wild, they compete unfairly for food resources, causing an increased rate of starvation among wild fish,” wrote Bruce Barcott in a December 2001 article in Mother Jones magazine.

Yet business is booming for fish farmers. Stricter environmental regulations in Norway have pushed fish farming operators to the Western hemisphere. In early 2002, the Canadian government lifted its seven-year moratorium on expanding fish farms in British Columbia. By 2003, there were 85 fish farms in operation in British Columbia and 90 applications pending. The government has stated its intention to quadruple the province’s salmon production by 2013.

Part of the allure of fish farming is to reduce the pressure on the world’s oceans, but that may be wishful thinking. Fish farming is an inefficient means of producing protein. A Feb. 6, 2003 article in The Christian Science Monitor notes that raising carnivorous fish like salmon and shrimp may actually reduce the numbers of wild fish since it takes 2.2 pounds of ground-up fish to make a pound of farmed salmon.

Answer: Avoid most fish

Yet there seems to be a Gordian knot around fish consumption – and the very experts on whom we rely for the best possible information are sending us mixed messages about the best way to get the healthy fats fish provides.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration sets much more lenient toxin levels than does its kissing cousin, the Environmental Protection Agency. Most experts recommend being even more conservative about toxin exposure and some advise avoiding fish altogether.

Despite nutritionists extolling the virtues of high fish consumption, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration strongly recommends limiting the amount of fish we eat. The health advisory issued in March 2004 does not distinguish between farm-raised and wild-caught fish.

Let’s face it: Nearly all fish contains some level of mercury.

The FDA recommends that all women who are pregnant, may become pregnant, nursing mothers and young children abstain completely from shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish because of the high levels of mercury contamination that may be particularly harmful to unborn babies and the developing nervous system of young children.
The FDA advisory recommends weekly consumption of no more than 12 ounces of fish and shellfish lower in mercury, including shrimp, canned light tuna, salmon, pollock and catfish.

It also advises keeping up to date on local fish safety warnings and, if there is no advisory available, not to eat more than six ounces of local-caught fish weekly.

Yet many of us are still getting too much mercury—some of it due to the 40 tons of mercury released into the atmosphere annually by coal-fired power plants.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study in November 2005 that showed fully six percent of U.S. women of childbearing age had mercury levels above the levels that could put them at risk for nervous system defects.

Natural health advocate Joseph Mercola, D.O., says several more fish should be added to the list of fish to avoid, including tuna steaks, sea bass, oysters from the Gulf of Mexico, marlin, halibut, pike, walleye, white croaker and largemouth bass and urges the FDA to expand the list of fish to be avoided and those acceptable for limited consumption.

“I now warn my patients against consuming any fish, whether farm-raised or naturally-caught: fish of all varieties from any waters are now showing dangerously high levels of the tasteless, but highly toxic metal, mercury,” says Mercola.

  • Share/Bookmark

Note: This article was originally published in the e-zine 360boom

Evidence is building that depression can trigger diabetes. Don’t get diabetes, it my lead to depression. Don’t get depressed, it may lead to diabetes. A study has demonstrated a relationship between type 2 diabetes and depression; not only can diabetes lead to depression, depression can also lead to diabetes.

Dr. Sherita Hill Golden of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore led the study which tracked an ethnically diverse group – 5,000 men and women between ages 45 to 84 for three years. The study revealed that people with depression have a higher risk of developing the most common form of diabetes than others.

Those with symptoms of depression were 42% more likely to develop diabetes by the end of the study than those without such symptoms – the more serious the symptoms, the higher the risk of diabetes.

Researchers accounted for factors including obesity, lack of physical activity and smoking. They found the risk for diabetes was still 34% higher in patients with depression.

People in our study who had elevated symptoms of depression, were more likely to eat more calories, exercise less and were more likely to be smokers. As a consequence, they were also more obese.

Dr. Golden’s study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The study also measured the risk for developing depression among people who already had diabetes. To do this, the researchers excluded people who had elevated symptoms of depression at the outset of the study.

  • Share/Bookmark

April 29, 2009

In these troubled times, many of us can’t afford to go totally organic.

So, if you’re going part-way, how do you get the most bang for your food buck?

The chart below will help you make some decisions. Starting with pesticide-laden peaches, apples and sweet green peppers down to the low pesticide load pineapples, avocados and onions, this will give you some helpful tools.

Pesticide Load in Fruits and Vegetables

FRUIT/VEGETABLE
1 (worst) Peach
2 Apple
3 Sweet Bell Pepper
4 Celery
5 Nectarine
6 Strawberries
7 Cherries
8 Kale
9 Lettuce
10 Grapes-Imported
11 Carrot
12 Pear
13 Collard Green
14 Spinach
15 Potato
16 Green Beans
17 Summer Squash
18 Pepper
19 Cucumber
20 Raspberries
21 Grapes-Domestic
22 Plum
23 Orange
24 Cauliflower
25 Tangerine
26 Mushrooms
27 Banana
28 Winter Squash
29 Cantalope
30 Cranberries
31 Honeydew Melon
32 Grapefruit
33 Sweet Potato
34 Tomato
35 Broccoli
36 Watermelon
37 Papaya
38 Eggplant
39 Cabbage
40 Kiwi
41 Sweet Peas-Frozen
42 Asparagus
43 Mango
44 Pineapple
45 Sweet Corn-Frozen
46 Avocado
47 (best) Onion
Source: Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma (Penguin Books 2008)

I have to add a personal note here: I know coffee is technically a vegetable, certainly it is a staple of life for many of us. However, coffee is not included on the above list.

Coffee is one of the most pesticide intensive crops in the world. If you’re a coffee lover like I am, consider lowering your toxic load by buying organic coffee, better yet shade grown and fair traded to add to the eco-friendly perks. (Pun intended!)

Kathleen Barnes

  • Share/Bookmark

April 22, 2009

I couldn’t let Earth Day pass without offering some simple ways each of us can contribute to the healing of the planet.

I know. The enormity of the problem is often overwhelming.

The starfish story

It reminds me of the story of the small boy who came upon a beach littered with thousands of starfish, all in their death throes because the tide had carried them beyond the waterline.

The boy set about picking up the starfish and tossing them back into the sea. An old man walking the beach ridiculed the child for engaging in a hopeless cause.

“Why bother? You can’t save them all,” the old man proclaimed.

“That’s true. But I can save this one. And this one. And this one,” the boy replied as he continued returning the stranded starfish to the sea.

You can’t save the world by yourself, but you can do your part. Each of us together can make the change that will make a difference.

Do these today

Here are some really easy ways you can live sustainably, starting today. They will cost you nothing or almost nothing. In fact, most of them will save you money:

1. Get a stainless steel water bottle and stop drinking bottled water.
2. Invest in a few shopping bags and just say “no” to plastic bags.
3. If you don’t already do it recycle, at least your cans, bottles and paper.
4. Turn off the water while you’re brushing your teeth.
5. Limit your showers to five minutes.
6. Turn off the lights if you’re out of the room for more than five minutes.
7. Replace your regular light bulbs with compact fluorescents.
8. Eat organic foods as much as possible, especially fruits and coffee, which carry heavy pesticide loads.
9. Buy locally produced products, especially food. This saves on your gas, gives you fresher, more nutritious food and saves on the pollution and fuel consumption of long distance shipping.
10. Say “no” to acquiring additional plastic goods for your household.

Bonus

Finally, here’s your bonus:
Honor Earth Day by planting a tree on the south side of your house. In a few years, it will shade the house and lower your cooling costs in summer.

Happy Earth Day!

Kathleen Barnes

  • Share/Bookmark